KATIE PAKLER In August 2012 the Pennsylvania Supreme Court (hereinafter referred to as “Supreme Court”) decided yet another case upholding gaming license requirements under the Pennsylvania Race Horse Development and Gaming Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Gaming Act,” “Act”) and enforcing the power of the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board […]
Archive for August, 2013
THE “RULE OF REASON” PREFERRED TO “SCOPE OF PATENT” ANALYSIS WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER A REVERSE PAYMENT IS LEGAL IN THE THIRD CIRCUIT: IN RE K DUR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
LINDA M. POSTOL The Sherman Antitrust Act, passed by Congress in 1890, was a landmark decision aimed at regulating business practices that unfairly restrict trade in the marketplace. More recently, Congress passed the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, commonly known as the Hatch Waxman Act […]
