{"id":1241,"date":"2015-12-04T12:00:31","date_gmt":"2015-12-04T17:00:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sites.law.duq.edu\/juris\/?p=1241"},"modified":"2017-11-20T20:54:54","modified_gmt":"2017-11-21T01:54:54","slug":"death-of-the-author-copyright-and-the-public-domain","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.law.duq.edu\/juris\/2015\/12\/04\/death-of-the-author-copyright-and-the-public-domain\/","title":{"rendered":"Death of the Author: Copyright and the Public Domain"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_1242\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1242\" style=\"width: 440px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/sites.law.duq.edu\/juris\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/melody.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-1242\" src=\"http:\/\/sites.law.duq.edu\/juris\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/melody.jpg\" alt=\"Photo Courtesy of Happy-Birthday-Song.net\" width=\"440\" height=\"289\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sites.law.duq.edu\/juris\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/melody.jpg 440w, https:\/\/sites.law.duq.edu\/juris\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/melody-300x197.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 440px) 100vw, 440px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-1242\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo Courtesy of Happy-Birthday-Song.net<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Death of the Author: Copyright and the Public Domain<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">By Nicole Prieto<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The law favors protecting the rights of real property owners, but it also favors limiting someone\u2019s control over property after death, <u>i.e.<\/u>, \u201cdeadhand control.\u201d <strong>[1]<\/strong> But what about intellectual property? What ends up happening to something as intangible as an author\u2019s copyright after he or she dies?<\/p>\n<p>In early November, the Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) filed a claim for the ubiquitous \u201cHappy Birthday to You\u201d song, which in September was found not to have been owned by Warner\/Chappelle Music. <strong>[2]<\/strong> ACEI is a charity that was founded by one of the song\u2019s authors, Patty Hill. <strong>[3]<\/strong> Prior to ACEI\u2019s claim but after the September decision, the thought was that the song had entered the public domain. <strong>[4]<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Anyone can use and appropriate works in the public domain \u201cwithout liability for infringement.\u201d <strong>[5]<\/strong> Such works include those created prior to 1923. <strong>[6]<\/strong> This could be a fairly bright-line rule for a song such as \u201cHappy Birthday,\u201d whose lyrics were possibly written in the late nineteenth century. <strong>[7]<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The actual extant rights over the song, however, are far less clear. While under the impression it had the rights to \u201cHappy Birthday,\u201d Warner collected royalties from its use, a third of which had gone to ACEI. <strong>[8]<\/strong> The September decision held that a different entity, the Clayton F. Summy Company, had a right to the song\u2019s melody\u2014just not to its lyrics. <strong>[9]<\/strong> Copyright operates like personal property, <strong>[10]<\/strong> and the song\u2019s authors, Patty and Mildred Hill, had apparently given the melody rights to Summy Co.<\/p>\n<p>But assuming the rights to the lyrics had never been transferred, it is possible the copyrights remained with the last living Hill sister. <strong>[11]<\/strong> Mildred died in 1916, and Patty died in 1946. Their rights would have then descended to their other sister, Jessica, from whom ACEI had apparently later received the rights. <strong>[12]<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>With respect to something as brief, well-known, and indiscriminately sung as \u201cHappy Birthday to You,\u201d it is perhaps surprising that so much has been made of a song now over a century old. It prompts the question of whether, as many had assumed after the September decision, the song just ought to be given public domain status.<\/p>\n<p>According to the U.S. Copyright Office, \u201c[A] work is under copyright protection the moment it is created and fixed in a tangible form that is perceptible either directly or with the aid of a machine or device.\u201d <strong>[13]<\/strong> An author\u2019s work created today would remain protected throughout his or her life and usually 70 years after he or she died. <strong>[14]<\/strong> Works made by corporations last either \u201c95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever expires first.\u201d <strong>[15]<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Authors, of course, do not need to wait several decades after they have died to have their works enter the public domain. Authors can declare them to be in the public domain, or they can invoke creative commons licenses that let others use their works within certain parameters (<u>e.g.<\/u>, not using a work for commercial purposes). <strong>[16]<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In property law, the interests of the living tend to take priority over those of the long-deceased, promoting the alienability of property with principles such as the rule against perpetuities. The statutory expiration of copyrights coupled with public domain status may serve as a similar protection against perpetual \u201cdeadhand\u201d IP control.<\/p>\n<p>For a song like \u201cHappy Birthday\u201d\u2014whose authors would have long since passed and whose nigh-genericized cultural ubiquity at least appears to make copyright protection moot\u2014perhaps it is time for its protection to come to an end.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>[1]<\/strong> <u>Black&#8217;s Law Dictionary<\/u> (Bryan A. Garner ed., 10th ed. 2014), <u>available at<\/u> Westlaw.<\/p>\n<p><strong>[2]<\/strong> Bill Donahue, <u>Group Claims It Owns The Rights To \u2018Happy Birthday\u2019 Song<\/u>, Law360 (Nov. 10, 2015), http:\/\/www.law360.com\/articles\/725651\/group-claims-it-owns-the-rights-to-happy-birthday-song.<\/p>\n<p><strong>[3]<\/strong> <u>Id.<\/u><\/p>\n<p><strong>[4]<\/strong> <u>Id.<\/u><\/p>\n<p><strong>[5]<\/strong> <u>Black&#8217;s Law Dictionary<\/u>, <u>supra<\/u>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>[6]<\/strong> Peter B. Hirtle, <u>Copyright Term and the Public Domain in the United States<\/u>, Cornell.edu, https:\/\/copyright.cornell.edu\/resources\/publicdomain.cfm (last visited Nov. 29, 2015).<\/p>\n<p><strong>[7]<\/strong> <u>Marya v. Warner\/Chappell Music, Inc.<\/u>, No. CV 13-4460-GHK (MRWX) 2015 WL 5568497, at *19 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 22, 2015).<\/p>\n<p><strong>[8]<\/strong> Donahue, <u>supra<\/u>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>[9]<\/strong> <u>Marya<\/u>, WL 5568497, at *20.<\/p>\n<p><strong>[10]<\/strong> U.S. Copyright Office, <u>Circular 1<\/u> at 6 (2012).<\/p>\n<p><strong>[11]<\/strong> Donahue, <u>supra<\/u>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>[12]<\/strong> <u>Id.<\/u><\/p>\n<p><strong>[13]<\/strong> Library of Congress, <u>Copyright in General<\/u>, Copyright.gov, http:\/\/copyright.gov\/help\/faq\/faq-general.html#what (last visited Nov. 29, 2015).<\/p>\n<p><strong>[14]<\/strong> U.S. Copyright Office, <u>supra<\/u>, at 5.<\/p>\n<p><strong>[15]<\/strong> Hirtle, <u>supra<\/u>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>[16]<\/strong> Creative Commons, <u>About The Licenses<\/u>, CreativeCommons.gov, http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/ (last visited Nov. 29, 1015).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Death of the Author: Copyright and the Public Domain By Nicole Prieto &nbsp; The law favors protecting the rights of real property owners, but it also favors limiting someone\u2019s control over property after death, i.e., \u201cdeadhand control.\u201d [1] But what about intellectual property? What ends up happening to something as [\u2026] <\/p>\n<div class=\"clear\"><\/div>\n<p><a class=\"more_link clearfix\" href=\"https:\/\/sites.law.duq.edu\/juris\/2015\/12\/04\/death-of-the-author-copyright-and-the-public-domain\/\" rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1242,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,4],"tags":[266,265,269,264,262,267,268,263],"class_list":["post-1241","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-juris-blog","category-posts","tag-acei","tag-association-for-childhood-education-international","tag-author","tag-copyright","tag-deadhand-control","tag-happy-birthday-to-you","tag-infringement","tag-intellectual-property"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.law.duq.edu\/juris\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1241","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.law.duq.edu\/juris\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.law.duq.edu\/juris\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.law.duq.edu\/juris\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.law.duq.edu\/juris\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1241"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sites.law.duq.edu\/juris\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1241\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1243,"href":"https:\/\/sites.law.duq.edu\/juris\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1241\/revisions\/1243"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.law.duq.edu\/juris\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1242"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.law.duq.edu\/juris\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.law.duq.edu\/juris\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.law.duq.edu\/juris\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}