Volume 14-1

FOREIGN CORRUPTION BY PAYMENT OF LEGAL BILLS: GUIDANCE ON PROACTIVE DETECTION OF FCPA VIOLATIONS VIA PAYMENTS TO OUTSIDE LEGAL COUNSEL

ZACHARY D. CREGAR, ESQ. This article will highlight the unique risks of foreign bribes disguised as legitimate payment of legal bills to outside counsel, in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Further, this article will outline reasonable measures to create a proactive outside counsel supervisory and legal bill auditing […]

Read More

THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT GIVES A BROAD INTERPRETATION TO THE ANTI-RETALIATION PROVISION OF THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT OF 1938 BY RULING THAT THE PROVISION INCLUDES BOTH WRITTEN AND ORAL COMPLAINTS, BUT DECLINED TO RULE ON WHETHER THE PROVISION COVERS INTERNAL COMPLAINTS MADE TO PRIVATE EMPLOYERS: KASTEN V. SAINT-GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS CORP.

JORIE BAGNATO In Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., the United States Supreme Court gave a broad interpretation to the anti-retaliation provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 19381 (herein-after referred to as the “Act”) by ruling that the provision punishing employers who discharge employees for filing complaints includes […]

Read More

THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT EXEMPTION 7(C) OF THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT DOES NOT APPLY TO CORPORATIONS: FCC V. AT & T INC.

JOSH BRICK In FCC v. AT & T Inc., the United States Supreme Court held that Exemption 7(C) of the Freedom of Information Act (hereinafter re-ferred to as “Exemption 7(C)”) is not applicable to corporations. The Court reasoned that corporations do not possess an interest in “personal privacy” under Exemption […]

Read More

HOW MUCH DOES QUALITY COST? ANALYZING THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT’S VALUE-BASED PURCHASING PROVISION AND HOW IT COULD AFFECT THE DELIVERY OF CARE BY HOSPITALS

KAREN KANE The demand for increased access and lower costs for medical care has been the impetus for change in the healthcare industry over the past few years. On March 23, 2010, significant changes in the delivery of healthcare were realized when President Barack Obama signed the Patient Protection and […]

Read More

A LOOK AT THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT’S HEAVY HANDED APPLICATION OF QUASI-JUDICIAL IMMUNITY: KEYSTONE REDEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DECKER

JEFFREY KRANKING When deciding Keystone Redevelopment Partners, LLC v. Decker, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld a line of decisions that misconstrues the functional comparability test used for administering absolute, quasi-judicial immunity. Ultimately, the appellate court and others before it have ignored the reasoning used […]

Read More